Long and short of it

Jan. 09, 2004

Some people are fixated with lengths, from longer
hair to longer legs to longer penises. Some people
think that longer is better, just like with the
ability to prolong copulation. The longer you
sustain one orgasm or have multiple orgasms over
just one period of lenghty, sweaty, intercourse,
would merit you a badge, a medal, or a trophy. But
as in any physical stimulation, pain or pleasure
is ephemeral. And wouldn't NOT prolonging the sex
act give you and your partner extra time to do
other things that could also produce various forms
of pleasurable feelings?

I don't know if there would be more men than women
who would think that a lengthier sex act is better.
I think only women can fake their orgasms so I
suppose women won't mind having just one a night in
maybe 15 minutes? Men, on the other hand, seem to
relish the idea of being able to make things longer.
For one, almost every man thinks that a longer dick
means a happier chick (or partner, to be politically
correct about it), well, except of course for those
who move to justify that endowment is useless
without proper style. So men then only think this
way just to feel superior? And yet during the sex
act, humans are at one of their most vulnerable.

The best tools do not necessarily make the best
products. And even then, somewhere else, there
could be one that is better. Long times spent on a
task does not mean a high-quality result. It is
more probable that the doer ends up more tired. So
just get whatever you have to do done in the least
amount of time, yet putting as much of yourself
into it, then you'll never fall short of doing
the best that you can for more things.